linux-kernel - [for-linus][PATCH 04/15] tracing: Modify print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230615133415.478015212@goodmis.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:05:35 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 04/15] tracing: Modify print_fields() for fields output order

From: sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>

Now the print_fields() print trace event fields in reverse order. Modify
it to the positive sequence.

Example outputs for a user event:
	test0 u32 count1; u32 count2

Output before:
	example-2547    [000] .....   325.666387: test0: count2=0x2 (2) count1=0x1 (1)

Output after:
	example-2742    [002] .....   429.769370: test0: count1=0x1 (1) count2=0x2 (2)

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230525085232.5096-1-sunliming@kylinos.cn

Fixes: 80a76994b2d88 ("tracing: Add "fields" option to show raw trace event fields")
Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
index 15f05faaae44..1e33f367783e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ static void print_fields(struct trace_iterator *iter, struct trace_event_call *c
 	int ret;
 	void *pos;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(field, head, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(field, head, link) {
 		trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, " %s=", field->name);
 		if (field->offset + field->size > iter->ent_size) {
 			trace_seq_puts(&iter->seq, "<OVERFLOW>");
-- 
2.39.2