[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617059.1686929309@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:28:29 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Catherine Sullivan <csully@...gle.com>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] mm: Make the page_frag_cache allocator alignment param a pow-of-2
Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> The requirement should only be cache alignment, not power of 2
> alignment.
Sure, but, upstream, page_frag_alloc_align() allows the specification of an
alignment and applies that alignment by:
offset &= align_mask;
which doesn't really make sense unless the alignment boils down to being a
power of two. Now, it might make sense to kill off the align_mask parameter
and just go with SMP_CACHE_BYTES (which will be a power of two).
Note, though, that most users seem to use an align_mask of ~0u which feels a
bit dodgy (it's not an unsigned long), but is probably fine.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists