Message-ID: <cb1d4b05-26f3-22f5-ce8e-813d255cda8a@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:32:29 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Prakruthi Deepak Heragu <quic_pheragu@...cinc.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Murali Nalajala <quic_mnalajal@...cinc.com>,
        Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
        Srivatsa Vaddagiri <quic_svaddagi@...cinc.com>,
        Carl van Schaik <quic_cvanscha@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/25] docs: gunyah: Introduce Gunyah Hypervisor

On 6/13/23 12:20 PM, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Gunyah is an open-source Type-1 hypervisor developed by Qualcomm. It
> does not depend on any lower-privileged OS/kernel code for its core
> functionality. This increases its security and can support a smaller
> trusted computing based when compared to Type-2 hypervisors.

s/based/base/

> 
> Add documentation describing the Gunyah hypervisor and the main
> components of the Gunyah hypervisor which are of interest to Linux
> virtualization development.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>

I have some questions and comments.  But I trust that you
can answer them and update your patch in a reasonable way
to address what I say.  So... please consider these things,
and update as you see fit.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>

> ---
>   Documentation/virt/gunyah/index.rst         | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   Documentation/virt/gunyah/message-queue.rst |  63 +++++++++++
>   Documentation/virt/index.rst                |   1 +
>   3 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/gunyah/index.rst
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/gunyah/message-queue.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/gunyah/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/gunyah/index.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..74aa345e0a144
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/gunyah/index.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +=================
> +Gunyah Hypervisor
> +=================
> +
> +.. toctree::
> +   :maxdepth: 1
> +
> +   message-queue
> +
> +Gunyah is a Type-1 hypervisor which is independent of any OS kernel, and runs in
> +a higher CPU privilege level. It does not depend on any lower-privileged operating system
> +for its core functionality. This increases its security and can support a much smaller
> +trusted computing base than a Type-2 hypervisor.
> +
> +Gunyah is an open source hypervisor. The source repo is available at
> +https://github.com/quic/gunyah-hypervisor.
> +
> +Gunyah provides these following features.
> +
> +- Scheduling:
> +
> +  A scheduler for virtual CPUs (vCPUs) on physical CPUs enables time-sharing
> +  of the CPUs. Gunyah supports two models of scheduling:
> +
> +    1. "Behind the back" scheduling in which Gunyah hypervisor schedules vCPUS on its own.

s/VCPUS/VCPUs/

> +    2. "Proxy" scheduling in which a delegated VM can donate part of one of its vCPU slice
> +       to another VM's vCPU via a hypercall.

This might sound dumb, but can there be more vCPUs than there
are physical CPUs?  Is a vCPU *tied* to a particular physical
CPU, or does it just indicate that a VM has one abstracted CPU
available to use--and any available physical CPU core can
implement it (possibly changing between time slices)?

> +
> +- Memory Management:
> +
> +  APIs handling memory, abstracted as objects, limiting direct use of physical
> +  addresses. Memory ownership and usage tracking of all memory under its control.
> +  Memory partitioning between VMs is a fundamental security feature.
> +
> +- Interrupt Virtualization:
> +
> +  Uses CPU hardware interrupt virtualization capabilities. Interrupts are handled
> +  in the hypervisor and routed to the assigned VM.
> +
> +- Inter-VM Communication:
> +
> +  There are several different mechanisms provided for communicating between VMs.
> +
> +- Virtual platform:
> +
> +  Architectural devices such as interrupt controllers and CPU timers are directly provided
> +  by the hypervisor as well as core virtual platform devices and system APIs such as ARM PSCI.
> +
> +- Device Virtualization:
> +
> +  Para-virtualization of devices is supported using inter-VM communication.
> +
> +Architectures supported
> +=======================
> +AArch64 with a GIC
> +
> +Resources and Capabilities
> +==========================
> +
> +Some services or resources provided by the Gunyah hypervisor are described to a virtual machine by
> +capability IDs. For instance, inter-VM communication is performed with doorbells and message queues.
> +Gunyah allows access to manipulate that doorbell via the capability ID. These resources are
> +described in Linux as a struct gh_resource.
> +
> +High level management of these resources is performed by the resource manager VM. RM informs a
> +guest VM about resources it can access through either the device tree or via guest-initiated RPC.
> +
> +For each virtual machine, Gunyah maintains a table of resources which can be accessed by that VM.
> +An entry in this table is called a "capability" and VMs can only access resources via this
> +capability table. Hence, virtual Gunyah resources are referenced by a "capability IDs" and not
> +"resource IDs". If 2 VMs have access to the same resource, they might not be using the same
> +capability ID to access that resource since the capability tables are independent per VM.
> +
> +Resource Manager
> +================
> +
> +The resource manager (RM) is a privileged application VM supporting the Gunyah Hypervisor.
> +It provides policy enforcement aspects of the virtualization system. The resource manager can
> +be treated as an extension of the Hypervisor but is separated to its own partition to ensure
> +that the hypervisor layer itself remains small and secure and to maintain a separation of policy
> +and mechanism in the platform. RM runs at arm64 NS-EL1 similar to other virtual machines.
> +
> +Communication with the resource manager from each guest VM happens with message-queue.rst. Details
> +about the specific messages can be found in drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.c
> +
> +::
> +
> +  +-------+   +--------+   +--------+
> +  |  RM   |   |  VM_A  |   |  VM_B  |
> +  +-.-.-.-+   +---.----+   +---.----+
> +    | |           |            |
> +  +-.-.-----------.------------.----+
> +  | | \==========/             |    |
> +  |  \========================/     |
> +  |            Gunyah               |
> +  +---------------------------------+
> +
> +The source for the resource manager is available at https://github.com/quic/gunyah-resource-manager.
> +
> +The resource manager provides the following features:
> +
> +- VM lifecycle management: allocating a VM, starting VMs, destruction of VMs
> +- VM access control policy, including memory sharing and lending
> +- Interrupt routing configuration
> +- Forwarding of system-level events (e.g. VM shutdown) to owner VM
> +
> +When booting a virtual machine which uses a devicetree such as Linux, resource manager overlays a
> +/hypervisor node. This node can let Linux know it is running as a Gunyah guest VM,
> +how to communicate with resource manager, and basic description and capabilities of

Maybe:

This node lets Linux know it is running as a Gunyah guest VM.
It provides a basic description and capabilities of the VM,
as well as information required to communicate with the resource
manager.

> +this VM. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/gunyah-hypervisor.yaml for a description
> +of this node.
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/gunyah/message-queue.rst b/Documentation/virt/gunyah/message-queue.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..b352918ae54b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/gunyah/message-queue.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Message Queues
> +==============
> +Message queue is a simple low-capacity IPC channel between two VMs. It is

I don't know what the "capacity" of an IPC channel is.  But
that's OK I guess; it's sort of descriptive.

> +intended for sending small control and configuration messages. Each message
> +queue is unidirectional, so a full-duplex IPC channel requires a pair of queues.
> +
> +Messages can be up to 240 bytes in length. Longer messages require a further
> +protocol on top of the message queue messages themselves. For instance, communication
> +with the resource manager adds a header field for sending longer messages via multiple
> +message fragments.
> +
> +The diagram below shows how message queue works. A typical configuration involves
> +2 message queues. Message queue 1 allows VM_A to send messages to VM_B. Message
> +queue 2 allows VM_B to send messages to VM_A.
> +
> +1. VM_A sends a message of up to 240 bytes in length. It raises a hypercall
> +   with the message to inform the hypervisor to add the message to
> +   message queue 1's queue. The hypervisor copies memory into the internal
> +   message queue representation; the memory doesn't need to be shared between
> +   VM_A and VM_B.
> +
> +2. Gunyah raises the corresponding interrupt for VM_B (Rx vIRQ) when any of
> +   these happens:
> +
> +   a. gh_msgq_send() has PUSH flag. Queue is immediately flushed. This is the typical case.
> +   b. Explicility with gh_msgq_push command from VM_A.

s/Explicility/Explicitly/

Is gh_msgq_send() a function and gh_msgq_push a "command" or
something?  Why the difference in parentheses?  (Pick a
convention and follow it.)

Does "Queue is flushed" mean "VM_B is interrupted"?

VM_A calls gh_msgq_push, and that causes the VM_B interrupt to
be signaled?

I'm being a little picky but I think these descriptions could be
improved a bit.

> +   c. Message queue has reached a threshold depth.
> +
> +3. VM_B calls gh_msgq_recv() and Gunyah copies message to requested buffer.

It sure would be nice if all this didn't have to be copied
twice.  But I recognize the copies ensure isolation.

> +
> +4. Gunyah buffers messages in the queue. If the queue became full when VM_A added a message,
> +   the return values for gh_msgq_send() include a flag that indicates the queue is full.
> +   Once VM_B receives the message and, thus, there is space in the queue, Gunyah
> +   will raise the Tx vIRQ on VM_A to indicate it can continue sending messages.

Does the Tx vIRQ on VM_A fire after *every* message is sent,
or only when the state of the queue goes from "full" to "not"?
(Looking at patch 6 it looks like the latter.)

If it's signaled after every message is sent, does it
indicate that the message has been *received* by VM_B
(versus just received and copied by Gunyah)?

> +
> +For VM_B to send a message to VM_A, the process is identical, except that hypercalls
> +reference message queue 2's capability ID. Each message queue has its own independent
> +vIRQ: two TX message queues will have two vIRQs (and two capability IDs).
> +
> +::
> +
> +      +---------------+         +-----------------+         +---------------+
> +      |      VM_A     |         |Gunyah hypervisor|         |      VM_B     |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |   Tx    |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |-------->|                 | Rx vIRQ |               |
> +      |gh_msgq_send() | Tx vIRQ |Message queue 1  |-------->|gh_msgq_recv() |
> +      |               |<------- |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      | Message Queue |         |                 |         | Message Queue |
> +      | driver        |         |                 |         | driver        |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |         |                 |   Tx    |               |
> +      |               | Rx vIRQ |                 |<--------|               |
> +      |gh_msgq_recv() |<--------|Message queue 2  | Tx vIRQ |gh_msgq_send() |
> +      |               |         |                 |-------->|               |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      |               |         |                 |         |               |
> +      +---------------+         +-----------------+         +---------------+
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/index.rst
> index 7fb55ae08598d..15869ee059b35 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/index.rst
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Virtualization Support
>      coco/sev-guest
>      coco/tdx-guest
>      hyperv/index
> +   gunyah/index
>   
>   .. only:: html and subproject
>   

Powered by blists - more mailing lists