[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2b98d80-8e9a-6083-3bc5-677bef0d3263@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:47:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, masahisa.kojima@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the
Synquacer platform
On 16/06/2023 18:23, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 05:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@...aro.org wrote:
>>> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer).
>>> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that.
>>
>> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
>>
> I can remove it, but I see many mentions like "Fix bindings for" "Add
> binding for" etc in the subject line.
Can we fix them as well?
>
>>
>> Binding without it's user is usually useless. Where is the user?
>>
> It is required for SystemReady-2.0 certification.
For what? If there is no user, it is not required for SR. We don't
document compatibles for something which does not exist in the projects.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists