[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <168694159988.404.1902283865304443546.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:53:19 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
"Bhatnagar, Rishabh" <risbhat@...zon.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/urgent] tick/common: Align tick period during sched_timer setup
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 13bb06f8dd42071cb9a49f6e21099eea05d4b856
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/13bb06f8dd42071cb9a49f6e21099eea05d4b856
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:18:30 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:45:28 +02:00
tick/common: Align tick period during sched_timer setup
The tick period is aligned very early while the first clock_event_device is
registered. At that point the system runs in periodic mode and switches
later to one-shot mode if possible.
The next wake-up event is programmed based on the aligned value
(tick_next_period) but the delta value, that is used to program the
clock_event_device, is computed based on ktime_get().
With the subtracted offset, the device fires earlier than the exact time
frame. With a large enough offset the system programs the timer for the
next wake-up and the remaining time left is too small to make any boot
progress. The system hangs.
Move the alignment later to the setup of tick_sched timer. At this point
the system switches to oneshot mode and a high resolution clocksource is
available. At this point it is safe to align tick_next_period because
ktime_get() will now return accurate (not jiffies based) time.
[bigeasy: Patch description + testing].
Fixes: e9523a0d81899 ("tick/common: Align tick period with the HZ tick.")
Reported-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>
Reported-by: "Bhatnagar, Rishabh" <risbhat@...zon.com>
Suggested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/5a56290d-806e-b9a5-f37c-f21958b5a8c0@grsecurity.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/12c6f9a3-d087-b824-0d05-0d18c9bc1bf3@amazon.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615091830.RxMV2xf_@linutronix.de
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 13 +------------
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 65b8658..e9138cd 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -218,19 +218,8 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
* this cpu:
*/
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) {
- ktime_t next_p;
- u32 rem;
-
tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
-
- next_p = ktime_get();
- div_u64_rem(next_p, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
- if (rem) {
- next_p -= rem;
- next_p += TICK_NSEC;
- }
-
- tick_next_period = next_p;
+ tick_next_period = ktime_get();
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
/*
* The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 5225467..42c0be3 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -161,8 +161,19 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void)
raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
/* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */
- if (last_jiffies_update == 0)
+ if (last_jiffies_update == 0) {
+ u32 rem;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the tick is aligned to a multiple of
+ * TICK_NSEC.
+ */
+ div_u64_rem(tick_next_period, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
+ if (rem)
+ tick_next_period += TICK_NSEC - rem;
+
last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period;
+ }
period = last_jiffies_update;
write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists