[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230616102524.73bb5efb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:25:24 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@...o.com>, Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the f2fs tree with the mm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the f2fs tree got a conflict in:
fs/f2fs/file.c
between commit:
0d625446d0a4 ("backing_dev: remove current->backing_dev_info")
from the mm tree and commit:
d61812691182 ("f2fs: enable nowait async buffered writes")
from the f2fs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/f2fs/file.c
index 7134fe8bd008,41e7c2b80f31..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@@ -4514,12 -4535,12 +4535,9 @@@ static ssize_t f2fs_buffered_write_iter
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
ssize_t ret;
- if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- current->backing_dev_info = inode_to_bdi(inode);
ret = generic_perform_write(iocb, from);
- current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
if (ret > 0) {
- iocb->ki_pos += ret;
f2fs_update_iostat(F2FS_I_SB(inode), inode,
APP_BUFFERED_IO, ret);
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists