[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70c39db97475939719720ab1902aa1c1.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:27:42 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/22] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Separate out interconnect bus clocks
Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2023-06-15 00:49:59)
> On 15.06.2023 02:48, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2023-06-14 11:04:37)
> >> @@ -1332,6 +1275,15 @@ static int rpm_smd_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> goto err;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + for (i = 0; i < desc->num_icc_clks; i++) {
> >> + if (!desc->icc_clks[i])
> >> + continue;
> >> +
> >> + ret = clk_smd_rpm_handoff(desc->icc_clks[i]);
> >
> > This API can probably take a const struct clk_smd_rpm pointer as well.
> It would be great, but ideally we want to set r->enabled in that func
> for !bus clocks (for unused clk cleanup). I could probably introduce a
> separate function for the icc clocks that takes const.
>
Sure. Or have this take const and in the clk driver set r->enabled after
calling it. That's future code though, so just make it take const?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists