[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca6b43b1-5b54-51c3-01f7-0cee6189e4be@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:34:28 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: <bjorn@...nel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <hawk@...nel.org>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<maxtram95@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: Remove unused inline function
xsk_buff_discard()
On 2023/6/15 22:40, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:51:49PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:49:23PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 08:46:12PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>>>> commit f2f167583601 ("xsk: Remove unused xsk_buff_discard")
>>>> left behind this, remove it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Yeah this is a stub for !CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS...
>>
>> Wait, I am not sure if this should go to bpf tree and have fixes tag
>> pointing to the cited commit?
>>
>> Functionally this commit does not fix anything but it feels that
>> f2f167583601 was incomplete.
>
> FWIIW, I think that bpf-next is appropriate for this patch
> as it doesn't address a bug.
Ok , will send v2 target to bpf-next.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists