lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a53089a-3c87-13e1-0bc4-29058ac0ec54@loongson.cn>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:53:38 +0800
From:   zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
        wanghongliang@...ngson.cn, Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] soc: dt-bindings: add loongson-2 pm



在 2023/6/16 下午2:58, Conor Dooley 写道:
> Hey,
> 
> Rob, could you take a look at this please? On v2 while you were away I
> was kinda struggling w/ suspend-address & whether it made sense.
> 
> The v2 & v1 are here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230522093156.7108-3-zhuyinbo@loongson.cn/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230517073149.31980-3-zhuyinbo@loongson.cn/
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 05:17:56PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>> Add the Loongson-2 SoC Power Management Controller binding with DT
>> schema format using json-schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>>   .../soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml       | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 +++
>>   2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..32499bd10f8c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml
> 
> The filename should ideally match one of the compatibles.


I learn about that yaml file name need match this compatible, but here
using a specific compatible as the name of the yaml file seems a bit
inappropriate . After all, this yaml file needs to cover lots of ls2k
series SoC rather than a specific SoC, and the yaml file naming in
kernel drivers is basically the same that use cover a series SoC's way.

> 
>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Loongson-2 Power Manager controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - loongson,ls2k1000-pmc
>> +              - loongson,ls2k0500-pmc
> 
> I notice the driver only supports one of these two. Is there a reason
> for that?


The driver can support both of the above, and I will add another.

> 
>> +          - const: syscon
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  interrupts:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  suspend-address:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> +    description:
>> +      The "suspend-address" is a deep sleep state (Suspend To RAM)
>> +      firmware entry address which was jumped from kernel and it's
>> +      value was dependent on specific platform firmware code. In
>> +      addition, the PM need according to it to indicate that current
>> +      SoC whether support Suspend To RAM.
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - interrupts
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +
>> +    pmc: pm@...27000 {
>         ^^^
> 
> nit: this label isn't used, so you can drop it.


This lable need to be used by poweroff and reboot node but I don't add
these node that reference pmc here.

Thanks,
Yinbo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ