[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9292d85-83b5-5b43-6c2a-7e393213c6c9@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:45:45 +0800
From: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
wanghongliang@...ngson.cn, Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] soc: loongson2_pm: add power management support
Hi huacai,
在 2023/6/15 下午7:15, zhuyinbo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2023/6/15 下午6:00, Huacai Chen 写道:
>
>>> +static void loongson2_pm_status_clear(void)
>>> +{
>>> + u16 value;
>>> +
>>> + value = loongson2_pm_readw(LOONGSON2_PM1_STS_REG);
>>> + value |= (LOONGSON2_PM1_PWRBTN_STS |
>>> LOONGSON2_PM1_PCIEXP_WAKE_STS |
>>> + LOONGSON2_PM1_WAKE_STS);
>>> + loongson2_pm_writew(value, LOONGSON2_PM1_STS_REG);
>>> + loongson2_pm_writel(loongson2_pm_readl(LOONGSON2_GPE0_STS_REG),
>>> + LOONGSON2_GPE0_STS_REG);
>> Long-line warnings is removed in latest kernel, so you don't need to
>> split here.
>
>
> okay, I got it.
>
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void loongson2_power_button_irq_enable(void)
>>
>> Using loongson2_pm_irq_enable is a little better.
>
>
Previously, you suggested that I combine loongson2_pm_irq_enable() and
power button irq enable code as loongson2_power_button_irq_enable, then
I remove the function loongson2_pm_irq_enable, in this case that I won't
be able to call loongson2_pm_irq_enable, so have I misunderstood your
meaning ? or only rename loongson2_power_button_irq_enable as
loongson2_pm_irq_enable ?
Thanks,
Yinbo
>
> ...
>
>>> +static int loongson2_suspend_valid_state(suspend_state_t state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM)
>>> + return 1;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>> "return (state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM)" is enough.
>
>
> okay, I got it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yinbo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists