[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08ed39eb-b1cf-7c15-83a4-dd59cc29732b@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:56:17 +0200
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] s390/uv: Always export uv_info
On 6/15/23 12:05, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> KVM needs the struct's values to be able to provide PV support.
>
> The uvdevice is currently guest only and will need the struct's values
> for call support checking and potential future expansions.
>
> As uv.c is only compiled with CONFIG_PGSTE or
> CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST we don't need a second check in
> the code. Users of uv_info will need to fence for these two config
> options for the time being.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@...ux.ibm.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
In the long term we'll remove the config checks and always compile uv.o
in kernel/ and boot/ so we won't be running in these issues again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists