[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230616094205.GC4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:42:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@...el.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] x86/tsc: use logical_packages as a better
estimation of socket numbers
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 09:19:18AM +0000, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> According to the MADT, there are indeed 40 valid CPUs. And then 80 CPUs
> with
>
> APIC ID : FF
> enabled : 0
> Online capable : 0
>
> a dumb question, why are these CPUs added into the possible_mask?
> I can dig into this later but I just don't have a quick answer at the
> moment.
I really don't know.. I've not gotten around to reading that part of the
x86 code yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists