[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33eabee3-f6f4-ee0c-d74b-98815a9567c4@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:42:46 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: lipeifeng@...o.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, gregkh@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: export func:shrink_slab
On 16.06.23 11:21, lipeifeng@...o.com wrote:
> From: lipeifeng <lipeifeng@...o.com>
>
> Some of shrinkers during shrink_slab would enter synchronous-wait
> due to lock or other reasons, which would causes kswapd or
> direct_reclaim to be blocked.
>
> This patch export shrink_slab so that it can be called in drivers
> which can shrink memory independently.
>
> Signed-off-by: lipeifeng <lipeifeng@...o.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 6d0cd2840cf0..2e54fa52e7ec 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> *
> * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
> */
> -static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> +unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> int priority)
> {
> @@ -1087,6 +1087,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> cond_resched();
> return freed;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrink_slab);
>
> static unsigned long drop_slab_node(int nid)
> {
It feels like something we don't want arbitrary drivers to call.
Unrelated to that, this better be sent along with actual driver usage.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists