[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1d065e98d7b0d115e6a2a562a2a5c68@walle.cc>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:51:27 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
Cc: tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, pratyush@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, git@....com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amitrkcian2002@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec, spi-nor: Add DT property
to avoid setting SRWD bit in status register
Am 2023-06-16 10:55, schrieb Amit Kumar Mahapatra:
> If the WP signal of the flash device is not connected and the software
> sets
> the status register write disable (SRWD) bit in the status register
> then
> thestatus register permanently becomes read-only. To avoid this added a
> new
> boolean DT property "broken-wp". If WP signal is not connected, then
> this
> property should be set in the DT to avoid setting the SRWD during
> status
> register write operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> index 89959e5c47ba..10a6df752f6f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> @@ -70,6 +70,21 @@ properties:
> be used on such systems, to denote the absence of a reliable
> reset
> mechanism.
>
> + broken-wp:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + The status register write disable (SRWD) bit in status register,
> combined
> + with the WP signal, provides hardware data protection for the
> device. When
> + the SRWD bit is set to 1, and the WP signal is either driven LOW
> or hard
> + strapped to LOW, the status register nonvolatile bits become
> read-only and
> + the WRITE STATUS REGISTER operation will not execute. The only
> way to exit
> + this hardware-protected mode is to drive WP HIGH. If the WP
> signal of the
> + flash device is not connected then status register permanently
> becomes
> + read-only as the SRWD bit cannot be reset. This boolean flag can
> be used
> + on systems in which WP signal is not connected, to avoid setting
> the SRWD
> + bit while writing the status register.
This is not true for all flashes, for example, Macronix flashes seem to
have
an internal pull-up, so if the pin is unconnected H/W write protection
is
disabled.
So maybe only mention that "if the pin is wrongly tied to GND (that
includes
internal pull-downs) or it is left floating".
Same goes for your comment in the driver code. Sorry for nitpicking, but
I fear some misuse of this property to disable the locking of the status
register.
> If the WP signal is hard strapped
> + to LOW then it is not broken as it can be a valid use case.
> +
I'm not sure it the bindings use negative notion of pins, because that
signal is usually called WP#.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists