linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the Synquacer platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <165dd295-1b3a-5062-772a-613a7bf6fd45@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 12:15:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     jaswinder.singh@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, masahisa.kojima@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the
 Synquacer platform

On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
> 
> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer).
> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that.

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

> 

Binding without it's user is usually useless. Where is the user?

Best regards,
Krzysztof