linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 10/16] drm/exynos: vidi: fix a wrong error return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230616102721.673775-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 06:27:13 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 10/16] drm/exynos: vidi: fix a wrong error return

From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>

[ Upstream commit 4a059559809fd1ddbf16f847c4d2237309c08edf ]

Fix a wrong error return by dropping an error return.

When vidi driver is remvoed, if ctx->raw_edid isn't same as fake_edid_info
then only what we have to is to free ctx->raw_edid so that driver removing
can work correctly - it's not an error case.

Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c
index e5662bdcbbde3..e96436e11a36c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c
@@ -468,8 +468,6 @@ static int vidi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ctx->raw_edid != (struct edid *)fake_edid_info) {
 		kfree(ctx->raw_edid);
 		ctx->raw_edid = NULL;
-
-		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	component_del(&pdev->dev, &vidi_component_ops);
-- 
2.39.2