lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:18:22 +0200
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 5/6] sched/fair: Add trivial fair server

On 6/16/23 15:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 6/16/23 14:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 05:58:17PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>>>> +void fair_server_init(struct rq *rq)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &rq->fair_server;
>>>> +
>>>> +	init_dl_entity(dl_se);
>>>> +
>>>> +	dl_se->dl_runtime = TICK_NSEC;
>>>> +	dl_se->dl_deadline = 20 * TICK_NSEC;
>>>> +	dl_se->dl_period = 20 * TICK_NSEC;
>>>> +
>>>> +	dl_server_init(dl_se, rq, fair_server_has_tasks, fair_server_pick);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> These here numbers should obviously become a tunable somewhere... :-)
>>
>> From sched_rt_runtime and sched_rt_period, no?
> 
> Well, probably new names. IIRC those are also limits on the whole
> rt-cgroup mess, so e can't trivially change it without also ripping all
> that out, and that's a little bit more work.
> 
> Ripping out the basic throttle is much simpler than replacing all that
> and should be done earlier.
> 

Life is easier then. Should them be a sysctl?

Like:
  kernel.sched_other_min_runtime_us ?
  kernel.sched_other_min_period_us ?

I bet you can come up with better names.

-- Daniel



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ