linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] thermal: loongson-2: add thermal management support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd3cc9db-bb60-8dfd-19b7-afeeedb65177@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:15:03 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>, wanghongliang@...ngson.cn,
        Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn,
        zhanghongchen <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] thermal: loongson-2: add thermal management
 support

On 17/06/2023 05:25, zhuyinbo wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> 在 2023/6/12 下午10:22, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>
>>> +#define LOONGSON2_SOC_MAX_SENSOR_NUM            4
>>> +
>>> +#define LOONGSON2_TSENSOR_CTRL_HI            0x0
>>> +#define LOONGSON2_TSENSOR_CTRL_LO            0x8
>>> +#define LOONGSON2_TSENSOR_STATUS            0x10
>>> +#define LOONGSON2_TSENSOR_OUT                0x14
>>
>> Please use BIT() macros
> 
> 
> I learn about that BIT() is generally used to describe the functional
> bit or control bit or status bits of a register, but these register was
> some different register offset and not some control bit or status bit
> So using BIT() here seems a bit inappropriate, Do you think so?

Yes, you are right


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog