[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aed1592f-927f-13ab-b692-7a0745ac5733@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:32:58 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Goud, Srinivas" <srinivas.goud@....com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"gcnu.goud@...il.com" <gcnu.goud@...il.com>,
"git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@....com>,
"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: can: xilinx_can: Add ECC property ‘xlnx,has-ecc’
On 14/06/2023 13:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/06/2023 12:22, Goud, Srinivas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1:23 PM
>>> To: Goud, Srinivas <srinivas.goud@....com>
>>> Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
>>> kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; gcnu.goud@...il.com; git (AMD-
>>> Xilinx) <git@....com>; michal.simek@...inx.com; linux-can@...r.kernel.org;
>>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: can: xilinx_can: Add ECC property
>>> ‘xlnx,has-ecc’
>>>
>>> On 12.06.2023 17:12:55, Srinivas Goud wrote:
>>>> ECC feature added to Tx and Rx FIFO’s for Xilinx CAN Controller.
>>>> Part of this feature configuration and counter registers added in IP
>>>> for 1bit/2bit ECC errors.
>>>> Please find more details in PG096 v5.1 document.
>>>>
>>>> xlnx,has-ecc is optional property and added to Xilinx CAN Controller
>>>> node if ECC block enabled in the HW.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@....com>
>>>
>>> Is there a way to introspect the IP core to check if this feature is compiled in?
>> There is no way(IP registers) to indicate whether ECC feature is enabled or not.
>
> Isn't this then deductible from compatible? Your binding claims it is
> only for AXI CAN, so xlnx,axi-can-1.00.a, even though you did not
> restrict it in the binding.
BTW, this is not an ACK, because this was not tested by automation. I
don't understand why get_maintainers.pl are so tricky to use, but
nevertheless I require resend to satisfy automation.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists