[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230617105137.GX52412@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 13:51:37 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, dvhart@...radead.org, dave@...olabs.net,
andrealmeid@...lia.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mm_init.c: remove obsolete macro HASH_SMALL
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 04:39:44PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2023/6/17 15:56, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 03:09:55PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> HASH_SMALL only works when parameter numentries is 0. But the sole caller
> >> futex_init() never calls alloc_large_system_hash() with numentries set to
> >> 0.
> >
>
> Thanks for your quick review.
>
> > Doesn't it?
> > What happens when CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is set?
>
> When CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is set, futex_hashsize is set to 16 and alloc_large_system_hash() is called with
> numentries == 16 && flags == HASH_SMALL. But in the alloc_large_system_hash(), we have the below logic:
>
> alloc_large_system_hash()
> {
> if (!numentries) { /* numentries == 16 here, so this code block is skipped. */
> ...
> if (unlikely(flags & HASH_SMALL)) { /* So as here. */
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> So HASH_SMALL is just unused. Or am I miss something?
You are right, I've missed that.
> Thanks.
>
> >
> >> So HASH_SMALL is obsolete and remove it.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 --
> >> kernel/futex/core.c | 3 +--
> >> mm/mm_init.c | 10 +---------
> >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> >> index f71ff9f0ec81..346d80809517 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> >> @@ -581,8 +581,6 @@ extern void *alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
> >> unsigned long high_limit);
> >>
> >> #define HASH_EARLY 0x00000001 /* Allocating during early boot? */
> >> -#define HASH_SMALL 0x00000002 /* sub-page allocation allowed, min
> >> - * shift passed via *_hash_shift */
> >> #define HASH_ZERO 0x00000004 /* Zero allocated hash table */
Can you update HASH_ZERO to 0x2?
> >>
> >> /* Only NUMA needs hash distribution. 64bit NUMA architectures have
> >> diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
> >> index 514e4582b863..f10587d1d481 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/futex/core.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
> >> @@ -1132,8 +1132,7 @@ static int __init futex_init(void)
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> futex_queues = alloc_large_system_hash("futex", sizeof(*futex_queues),
> >> - futex_hashsize, 0,
> >> - futex_hashsize < 256 ? HASH_SMALL : 0,
> >> + futex_hashsize, 0, 0,
> >> &futex_shift, NULL,
> >> futex_hashsize, futex_hashsize);
> >> futex_hashsize = 1UL << futex_shift;
> >> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> >> index d393631599a7..fab3c4649d5b 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> >> @@ -2492,15 +2492,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
> >> else
> >> numentries <<= (PAGE_SHIFT - scale);
> >>
> >> - /* Make sure we've got at least a 0-order allocation.. */
> >> - if (unlikely(flags & HASH_SMALL)) {
> >> - /* Makes no sense without HASH_EARLY */
> >> - WARN_ON(!(flags & HASH_EARLY));
> >> - if (!(numentries >> *_hash_shift)) {
> >> - numentries = 1UL << *_hash_shift;
> >> - BUG_ON(!numentries);
> >> - }
> >> - } else if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE))
> >> + if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE))
> >> numentries = PAGE_SIZE / bucketsize;
> >> }
> >> numentries = roundup_pow_of_two(numentries);
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists