linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm/gup: Cleanup next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2023 20:48:38 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm/gup: Cleanup next_page handling

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 05:53:44PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> The only path that doesn't use generic "**pages" handling is the gate vma.
> Make it use the same path, meanwhile tune the next_page label upper to
> cover "**pages" handling.  This prepares for THP handling for "**pages".
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/gup.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 8d59ae4554e7..a2d1b3c4b104 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			if (!vma && in_gate_area(mm, start)) {
>  				ret = get_gate_page(mm, start & PAGE_MASK,
>  						gup_flags, &vma,
> -						pages ? &pages[i] : NULL);
> +						pages ? &page : NULL);

Good spot... ugh that we handled this differently.

>  				if (ret)
>  					goto out;
>  				ctx.page_mask = 0;

We can drop this line now right? As the new next_page block will duplicate
this.

> @@ -1205,19 +1205,18 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  				ret = PTR_ERR(page);
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> -
> -			goto next_page;

This is neat, we've already checked if pages != NULL so the if (pages)
block at the new next_page label will not be run.

>  		} else if (IS_ERR(page)) {
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(page);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> +next_page:
>  		if (pages) {
>  			pages[i] = page;
>  			flush_anon_page(vma, page, start);
>  			flush_dcache_page(page);

I guess there's no harm that we now flush here, though it seems to me to be
superfluous, it's not a big deal I don't think.

>  			ctx.page_mask = 0;
>  		}
> -next_page:
> +
>  		page_increm = 1 + (~(start >> PAGE_SHIFT) & ctx.page_mask);
>  		if (page_increm > nr_pages)
>  			page_increm = nr_pages;
> --
> 2.40.1
>

Other than that, LGTM,

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>