lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230619092355.133c5cdb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:23:55 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:

  mm/mmap.c

between commit:

  606c812eb1d5 ("mm/mmap: Fix error path in do_vmi_align_munmap()")

from the origin tree and commits:

  66106c364147 ("mm: change do_vmi_align_munmap() side tree index")
  47b1d8de18f5 ("mm/mmap: change vma iteration order in do_vmi_align_munmap()")

from the mm tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc mm/mmap.c
index 98cda6f72605,474a0d856622..000000000000
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@@ -2398,15 -2409,27 +2396,29 @@@ do_vmi_align_munmap(struct vma_iterato
  			if (error)
  				goto end_split_failed;
  		}
 -		mas_set(&mas_detach, count);
 -		error = munmap_sidetree(next, &mas_detach);
 -		if (error)
 -			goto munmap_sidetree_failed;
 +		vma_start_write(next);
- 		mas_set_range(&mas_detach, next->vm_start, next->vm_end - 1);
 +		if (mas_store_gfp(&mas_detach, next, GFP_KERNEL))
 +			goto munmap_gather_failed;
 +		vma_mark_detached(next, true);
 +		if (next->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
 +			locked_vm += vma_pages(next);
  
  		count++;
+ 		if (unlikely(uf)) {
+ 			/*
+ 			 * If userfaultfd_unmap_prep returns an error the vmas
+ 			 * will remain split, but userland will get a
+ 			 * highly unexpected error anyway. This is no
+ 			 * different than the case where the first of the two
+ 			 * __split_vma fails, but we don't undo the first
+ 			 * split, despite we could. This is unlikely enough
+ 			 * failure that it's not worth optimizing it for.
+ 			 */
+ 			error = userfaultfd_unmap_prep(next, start, end, uf);
+ 
+ 			if (error)
+ 				goto userfaultfd_error;
+ 		}
  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE
  		BUG_ON(next->vm_start < start);
  		BUG_ON(next->vm_start > end);
@@@ -2454,14 -2455,18 +2444,20 @@@
  		BUG_ON(count != test_count);
  	}
  #endif
- 	/* Point of no return */
 +	error = -ENOMEM;
- 	vma_iter_set(vmi, start);
+ 	while (vma_iter_addr(vmi) > start)
+ 		vma_iter_prev_range(vmi);
+ 
  	if (vma_iter_clear_gfp(vmi, start, end, GFP_KERNEL))
 -		return -ENOMEM;
 +		goto clear_tree_failed;
  
 +	mm->locked_vm -= locked_vm;
  	mm->map_count -= count;
+ 	prev = vma_iter_prev_range(vmi);
+ 	next = vma_next(vmi);
+ 	if (next)
+ 		vma_iter_prev_range(vmi);
+ 
  	/*
  	 * Do not downgrade mmap_lock if we are next to VM_GROWSDOWN or
  	 * VM_GROWSUP VMA. Such VMAs can change their size under

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ