[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230618062451.79980-4-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 09:24:50 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
<avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] vsock/test: rework MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_STREAM
This new version makes test more complicated by adding empty read,
partial read and data comparisons between MSG_PEEK and normal reads.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index ac1bd3ac1533..104ac102e411 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -255,9 +255,13 @@ static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
close(fds[i]);
}
+#define MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN 64
+
static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
{
+ unsigned char buf[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
int fd;
+ int i;
fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
if (fd < 0) {
@@ -265,12 +269,21 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
- send_byte(fd, 1, 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
+ buf[i] = rand() & 0xFF;
+
+ control_expectln("SRVREADY");
+
+ send(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
close(fd);
}
static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
{
+ unsigned char buf_half[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN / 2];
+ unsigned char buf_normal[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
+ unsigned char buf_peek[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
+ ssize_t res;
int fd;
fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
@@ -279,8 +292,55 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
- recv_byte(fd, 1, MSG_PEEK);
- recv_byte(fd, 1, 0);
+ /* Peek from empty socket. */
+ res = recv(fd, buf_peek, sizeof(buf_peek), MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+ if (res != -1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "expected recv(2) failure, got %zi\n", res);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ if (errno != EAGAIN) {
+ perror("EAGAIN expected");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ control_writeln("SRVREADY");
+
+ /* Peek part of data. */
+ res = recv(fd, buf_half, sizeof(buf_half), MSG_PEEK);
+ if (res != sizeof(buf_half)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "recv(2) + MSG_PEEK, expected %zu, got %zi\n",
+ sizeof(buf_half), res);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ /* Peek whole data. */
+ res = recv(fd, buf_peek, sizeof(buf_peek), MSG_PEEK);
+ if (res != sizeof(buf_peek)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "recv(2) + MSG_PEEK, expected %zu, got %zi\n",
+ sizeof(buf_peek), res);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ /* Compare partial and full peek. */
+ if (memcmp(buf_half, buf_peek, sizeof(buf_half))) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Partial peek data mismatch\n");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ res = recv(fd, buf_normal, sizeof(buf_normal), 0);
+ if (res != sizeof(buf_normal)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "recv(2), expected %zu, got %zi\n",
+ sizeof(buf_normal), res);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ /* Compare full peek and normal read. */
+ if (memcmp(buf_peek, buf_normal, sizeof(buf_peek))) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Full peek data mismatch\n");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
close(fd);
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists