linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Keep memory type same on DEVMEM Page-Fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230619131417.42d4e73d1b7669162ea44e29@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:14:17 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "buddy.zhang" <buddy.zhang@...cuitos.cn>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Keep memory type same on DEVMEM Page-Fault

On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 11:39:44 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:22:36 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 11:37:50 +0800 "buddy.zhang" <buddy.zhang@...cuitos.cn> wrote:
> > 
> > > On X86 architecture, supports memory type on Page-table, such as
> > > PTE is PAT/PCD/PWD, which can setup up Memory Type as WC/WB/WT/UC etc.
> > > Then, Virtual address from userspace or kernel space can map to
> > > same physical page, if each page table has different memory type,
> > > then it's confused to have more memory type for same physical page.
> > 
> > Thanks.  Nobody has worked on this code for a long time.  I'll cc a few
> > folks who may be able to comment.
> > 
> 
> Well that didn't go very well.
> 
> Buddy, can you please explain what are the user-visible effects of the
> bug?  Does the kernel crash?  Memory corruption, etc?  Thanks.
> 

Anyone?