[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <348fbe1a-6c2d-68d2-b4fc-278407ede33c@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:58:13 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>, trenn@...e.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, gautham.shenoy@....com, Ray.Huang@....com,
Perry.Yuan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpupower: Recognise amd-pstate active mode driver
On 6/16/23 07:06, Wyes Karny wrote:
> amd-pstate active mode driver name is "amd-pstate-epp". Add this to the
> string matching condition to recognise amd-pstate active mode driver.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
> ---
> tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> index 9547b29254a7..21f653cd472c 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ bool cpupower_amd_pstate_enabled(void)
> if (!driver)
> return ret;
>
> - if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate"))
> + if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate") || !strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate-epp"))
To avoid getting caught in the case that a kernel didn't have the patch
separated from this series (for example if a distro missed it in a
backport from separate directories), how about using strncmp() instead
and just look for the prefix?
This would also let the tool be more future proofed in the case another
amd-pstate driver was introduced later down the road as long as it stuck
to "amd-pstate*"
> ret = true;
>
> cpufreq_put_driver(driver);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists