linux-kernel - Re: clk: Fix memory leak in devm_clk_notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56998d04-7f09-4982-b0f1-20ef917aa524@kadam.mountain>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:32:01 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: clk: Fix memory leak in devm_clk_notifier_register()

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:42:37AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > He doesn't have a very accurate perspective
> > of what is important and what is not important.
> 
> I offered various hints for desirable change possibilities.
> The change acceptance might evolve in more constructive ways, doesn't it?

No, I'm sorry, it's not constructive at all.  You're just creating noise
when we should be looking at if the patch is correct and how we can
improve our QC infrastructure to prevent bugs like this in the future.

regards,
dan carpenter