lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJAl-rznBaZubY3-@alley>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:55:06 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] watchdog/hardlockup: Make HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG
 sparc64-specific

On Fri 2023-06-16 09:48:06, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 8:07 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are several hardlockup detector implementations and several Kconfig
> > values which allow selection and build of the preferred one.
[...]
> > Note that HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY, HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF,
> > and HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY may conflict only with
> > HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH. They depend on HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> > and it is not longer enabled when HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> >
> > watchdog/sparc64: Rename HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG to HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_WATCHDOG_SPARC64
[...]
> > Also the variable is set only on sparc64. Move the definition
> > from arch/Kconfig to arch/sparc/Kconfig.debug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> 
> I think you goofed up when squashing the patches. You've now got a
> second patch subject after your first Signed-off-by and then a second
> Signed-off-by... I assume everything after the first Signed-off-by
> should be dropped?

Ah, you are right. It seems that Andrew has fixed this when taking
the patch.

Thank you both,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ