[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230619095629.qicy2guryvryc7el@quack3>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:56:29 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz, jack@...e.com,
tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, mark@...heh.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of
block_commit_write()
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:49, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
> Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index efb09de4343d..39d8dbb26bb3 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -808,12 +808,7 @@ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct inode *inode, u64 abs_from,
>
>
> /* must not update i_size! */
> - ret = block_commit_write(page, block_start + 1,
> - block_start + 1);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - mlog_errno(ret);
> - else
> - ret = 0;
> + block_commit_write(page, block_start + 1, block_start + 1);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists