[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00ef5b07-3c1a-40d2-0858-5aaf3c8d073c@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:29:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: proximity: Add bindings for Murata
IRS-D200
On 19/06/2023 12:40, Waqar Hameed wrote:
>> Node names should be generic. See also explanation and list of examples
>> in DT specification:
>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>
>> so I guess: proximity@?
>
> On that list there is "temperature-sensor". Would it make sense then to
> call it "proximity-sensor"?
Choose whatever is the most popular in existing Linux sources.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists