| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3fb062e5b86d70dff7a588a641bdc6d93dab4c2a.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:54:35 +0200
From: Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
michal.swiatkowski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: ice_vsi_release cleanup
Maciej Fijalkowski píše v Po 19. 06. 2023 v 14:38 +0200:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Petr Oros wrote:
> > Since commit 6624e780a577fc ("ice: split ice_vsi_setup into smaller
> > functions") ice_vsi_release does things twice. There is unregister
> > netdev which is unregistered in ice_deinit_eth also.
> >
> > It also unregisters the devlink_port twice which is also
> > unregistered
> > in ice_deinit_eth(). This double deregistration is hidden because
> > devl_port_unregister ignores the return value of xa_erase.
> >
> > [ 68.642167] Call Trace:
> > [ 68.650385] ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port+0xe/0x20 [ice]
> > [ 68.655656] ice_vsi_release+0x445/0x690 [ice]
> > [ 68.660147] ice_deinit+0x99/0x280 [ice]
> > [ 68.664117] ice_remove+0x1b6/0x5c0 [ice]
> >
> > [ 171.103841] Call Trace:
> > [ 171.109607] ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port+0xf/0x20 [ice]
> > [ 171.114841] ice_remove+0x158/0x270 [ice]
> > [ 171.118854] pci_device_remove+0x3b/0xc0
> > [ 171.122779] device_release_driver_internal+0xc7/0x170
> > [ 171.127912] driver_detach+0x54/0x8c
> > [ 171.131491] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd1
> > [ 171.135406] pci_unregister_driver+0x2d/0xb0
> > [ 171.139670] ice_module_exit+0xc/0x55f [ice]
>
> Hi Petr,
> can you tell us when in particular this call trace was observed?
I found out that the devlink port is deregistered twice. This calltrace
was generated by dump_stack() placed in devlink_port_unregister -> it
is testing trace, not from production.
Regards,
Petr
>
> CC: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...el.com>
>
> >
> > Fixes: 6624e780a577 ("ice: split ice_vsi_setup into smaller
> > functions")
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 27 --------------------
> > ----
> > 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > index 11ae0e41f518a1..284a1f0bfdb545 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > @@ -3272,39 +3272,12 @@ int ice_vsi_release(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > pf = vsi->back;
> >
> > - /* do not unregister while driver is in the reset recovery
> > pending
> > - * state. Since reset/rebuild happens through PF service
> > task workqueue,
> > - * it's not a good idea to unregister netdev that is
> > associated to the
> > - * PF that is running the work queue items currently. This
> > is done to
> > - * avoid check_flush_dependency() warning on this wq
> > - */
> > - if (vsi->netdev && !ice_is_reset_in_progress(pf->state) &&
> > - (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state))) {
> > - unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> > - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_PF)
> > - ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port(pf);
> > -
> > if (test_bit(ICE_FLAG_RSS_ENA, pf->flags))
> > ice_rss_clean(vsi);
> >
> > ice_vsi_close(vsi);
> > ice_vsi_decfg(vsi);
> >
> > - if (vsi->netdev) {
> > - if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi-
> > >state)) {
> > - unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> > - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi-
> > >state);
> > - }
> > - if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_ALLOCD, vsi->state)) {
> > - free_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> > - vsi->netdev = NULL;
> > - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_ALLOCD, vsi-
> > >state);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > /* retain SW VSI data structure since it is needed to
> > unregister and
> > * free VSI netdev when PF is not in reset recovery pending
> > state,\
> > * for ex: during rmmod.
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> > Intel-wired-lan@...osl.org
> > https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists