[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pndo7lb1mes.fsf@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:24:28 +0200
From: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: Add driver for Murata IRS-D200
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 14:35 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:10:42 +0200
> Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com> wrote:
>
>> Murata IRS-D200 is a PIR sensor for human detection. It has support for
>> raw data measurements and detection event notification.
>>
>> Add a driver with support for triggered buffer and events. Map the
>> various settings to the `iio` framework, e.g. threshold values, sampling
>> frequency, filter frequencies etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>
>
> Hi Waqar,
>
> Generally looks pretty good to me.
> A few comments inline to add to Lars-Peter's review.
Thank you for your thorough review!
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/irsd200.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/irsd200.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..699801d60295
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/irsd200.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1051 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Driver for Murata IRS-D200 PIR sensor.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Axis Communications AB
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/events.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/trigger.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/types.h>
>> +
>> +#define IRS_DRV_NAME "irsd200"
>> +
>> +/* Registers. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_OP 0x00 /* Operation mode. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_DATA_LO 0x02 /* Sensor data LSB. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_DATA_HI 0x03 /* Sensor data MSB. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_STATUS 0x04 /* Interrupt status. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_COUNT 0x05 /* Count of exceeding threshold. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_DATA_RATE 0x06 /* Output data rate. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_FILTER 0x07 /* High-pass and low-pass filter. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_INTR 0x09 /* Interrupt mode. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_NR_COUNT 0x0a /* Number of counts before interrupt. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_THR_HI 0x0b /* Upper threshold. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_THR_LO 0x0c /* Lower threshold. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_TIMER_LO 0x0d /* Timer setting LSB. */
>> +#define IRS_REG_TIMER_HI 0x0e /* Timer setting MSB. */
>> +
>> +/* Interrupt status bits. */
>> +#define IRS_INTR_DATA 0 /* Data update. */
>> +#define IRS_INTR_TIMER 1 /* Timer expiration. */
>> +#define IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_AND 2 /* Count "AND" threshold. */
>> +#define IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_OR 3 /* Count "OR" threshold. */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Quantization scale value for threshold. Used for conversion from/to register
>> + * value.
>> + */
>> +#define IRS_THR_QUANT_SCALE 128
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The upper 4 bits in register IRS_REG_COUNT value is the upper count value
>> + * (exceeding upper threshold value). The lower 4 is the lower count value
>> + * (exceeding lower threshold value).
>
> Code makes this obvious. This is just a comment that might become wrong in
> future (adds little) - so I'd drop it.
I understand, will do!
>> + */
>> +#define IRS_UPPER_COUNT(count) (count >> 4)
>> +#define IRS_LOWER_COUNT(count) (count & GENMASK(3, 0))
>
> What Lars said on this one ((count) & GENMAKS(3, 0)
>
> or better yet FIELD_GET() with appropriately defined mask for each of these
> as that is more readable in general.
I agree, `FIELD_GET()` is better.
>> +/*
>> + * Index corresponds to the (field) value of IRS_REG_FILTER register. Contains
>> + * only the fractional part (since the integer part is 0, e.g the first value
>> + * corresponds to 0.3 Hz).
>> + */
>> +static const unsigned int irsd200_hp_filter_freq[2] = {
>
> [] probably easier. Means reviewer doesn't need to sanity the length.
Alright.
>> + 3,
>> + 5,
>> +};
>
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_setup(struct irsd200_data *data)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int val;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Disable all interrupt sources. */
>
> I assume the device doesn't provide any means of resetting it to get a known
> register state? Bit unusual to need to disable interrupts rather than be
> able to assume they are already disabled.
There is no dedicated reset (other than explicitly power cycle it of
course). I mean, according to the data sheet, the default value is zero
(i.e. interrupt disabled). It wouldn't hurt to be really sure here,
right?
This register and IRS_REG_OP below are the important one to be sure
about during the setup (we want to be sure that it is in _this_ state
here).
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, IRS_REG_INTR, 0);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not set interrupt sources (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Set operation to active. */
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, IRS_REG_OP, 0x00);
>
> That 0 value probably wants a define.
Yeah, I'll add that.
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not set operation mode (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Clear threshold count. */
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_COUNT, &val);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not clear threshold count (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Clear status. */
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, IRS_REG_STATUS, 0x0f);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not clear status (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_read_data(struct irsd200_data *data, s16 *val)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int tmpval;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_DATA_HI, &tmpval);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read hi data (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *val = (s16)(tmpval << 8);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_DATA_LO, &tmpval);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read lo data (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *val |= tmpval;
>
> As below - bulk read and endian conversion if possible.
Yes, will use `regmap_bulk_read()`.
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +stan 0;
(What happened here?)
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_write_data_rate(struct irsd200_data *data, int val)
>> +{
>> + size_t idx;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(irsd200_data_rates); ++idx) {
>> + if (irsd200_data_rates[idx] == val)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (idx == ARRAY_SIZE(irsd200_data_rates))
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, IRS_REG_DATA_RATE, idx);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not write data rate (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Data sheet says the device needs 3 seconds of settling time. */
>> + ssleep(3);
> You aren't preventing other userspace reads / writes during that time so
> this is a light protection at best.
Yes, we aren't preventing anything. The hardware actually operates
without any "errors" during this period (e.g. buffer data and events
keep arriving).
This is more of a guarantee that "within 3 s, the new data rate should
be in effect". When I think about it, we should maybe just remove this
sleep?
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_read_timer(struct irsd200_data *data, int *val, int *val2)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int tmpval;
>> + unsigned int regval;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_TIMER_HI, &tmpval);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read hi timer (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Value is 10 bits. IRS_REG_TIMER_HI is the two MSBs. */
>> + regval = tmpval << 8;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_TIMER_LO, &tmpval);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read lo timer (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> Bulk read and endian conversion preferred for this as Lars pointed out.
> Help with various thing including preventing tearing of the value if someone
> else is writing whilst it is being read.
>
> In general, you may want to look at using a local lock to ensure consistent
> state whenever there are multiple reads / writes in a given function that userspace
> can cause to be called.
Yeah, will use bulk read here as well.
[...]
>> +static int irsd200_write_hp_filter(struct irsd200_data *data, int val, int val2)
>> +{
>> + size_t idx;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Truncate fractional part to one digit. */
>> + val2 /= 100000;
>> +
>> + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(irsd200_hp_filter_freq); ++idx) {
>> + if (irsd200_hp_filter_freq[idx] == val2)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (idx == ARRAY_SIZE(irsd200_hp_filter_freq) || val != 0)
>> + return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(data->regfields[IRS_REGF_HP_FILTER], idx);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>
> For regmap calls, they are (I think) all documented as returning 0 for success
> and negative otherwise. That lets you both check the simpler if (ret) and ...
Maybe it _is_ too defensive here. However, I have encountered APIs where
positive values can/has been returned (due to debug/testing or just plain
slip ups), without any actual errors.
However, let's trust `regmap` then. I can change to only look for `if
(ret)` everywhere.
>
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not write hp filter frequency (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>
> drop this return ret out of the if block here.
>
> In general being able to ignore possibility of ret > 0 simplifies handling.
I try to be consistent and it also "helps" the next person potentially
adding code after the `if`-statement and forgetting about adding
`return`. We can drop the `return here, but then we should do the same
in other places with a check just before the last `return` (like
`irsd200_write_timer()`, `irsd200_read_nr_count()`,
`irsd200_write_nr_count()` and many more), right?
[...]
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_write_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
>> + enum iio_event_type type,
>> + enum iio_event_direction dir,
>> + enum iio_event_info info, int val, int val2)
>> +{
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> +
>> + switch (info) {
>> + case IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE:
>> + return irsd200_write_threshold(data, dir, val);
>> + case IIO_EV_INFO_TIMEOUT:
>> + return irsd200_write_timer(data, val, val2);
>> + case IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD:
>> + return irsd200_write_nr_count(data, val);
>> + case IIO_EV_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB:
>> + return irsd200_write_lp_filter(data, val);
>> + case IIO_EV_INFO_HIGH_PASS_FILTER_3DB:
>> + return irsd200_write_hp_filter(data, val, val2);
>
> Just to check - filtering is only on the data being used for events? Not
> on the direct readback of the data? Whilst that happens, it's not all that
> common - hence the check.
Well spotted! It actually made think here! :)
I do think it applies to the raw data (as well). Comparing that to
`IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ` (which also affects the events) we should
therefore probably move the filtering to `struct iio_chan_spec
irsd200_channels`, right?
[...]
>> +static int irsd200_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
>> + enum iio_event_type type,
>> + enum iio_event_direction dir, int state)
>> +{
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + unsigned int val;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH:
>> + /*
>> + * There is no way to tell the hardware to only signal for a
>> + * single direction. Let's just group IIO_EV_DIR_RISING and
>> + * IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING together instead of doing extra
>> + * (unnecessary) post-processing after an interrupt.
>> + */
> If you can't control them separately then you should use the EITHER direction
> for the enable. That means you get in_proximity_thresh_en
> covering both thresholds.
Ah, of course! I'll change!
>> +
>> + /* Clear the count register (by reading from it). */
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_COUNT, &val);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + val = !!state;
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(
>> + data->regfields[IRS_REGF_INTR_COUNT_THR_OR], val);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return val;
>> + case IIO_EV_TYPE_CHANGE:
>> + val = !!state;
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(data->regfields[IRS_REGF_INTR_TIMER],
>> + val);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return val;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t irsd200_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_id;
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + enum iio_event_direction dir;
>> + unsigned int lower_count;
>> + unsigned int upper_count;
>> + unsigned int status = 0;
>> + unsigned int source = 0;
>> + unsigned int clear = 0;
>> + unsigned int count = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_INTR, &source);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read interrupt source (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_STATUS, &status);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not acknowledge interrupt (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (status & BIT(IRS_INTR_DATA) && iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev)) {
>> + iio_trigger_poll_nested(indio_dev->trig);
>> + clear |= BIT(IRS_INTR_DATA);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (status & BIT(IRS_INTR_TIMER) && source & BIT(IRS_INTR_TIMER)) {
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_UNMOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_PROXIMITY, 0,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_CHANGE,
>> + IIO_EV_DIR_NONE),
>
> As below, I'd like more explanation of what this is.
> I can't find a datasheet to look it up in.
This is a timer for the detection event window time, i.e. the signal
should pass the threshold values within this time in order to get an
interrupt (`IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH`).
You setup the window time (`IIO_EV_INFO_TIMEOUT`), and when this timer
has expired, you get this interrupt (and thus `IIO_EV_TYPE_CHANGE`). I
couldn't find any other more fitting value in `enum iio_event_type`.
>> + iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
>> + clear |= BIT(IRS_INTR_TIMER);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (status & BIT(IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_OR) &&
>> + source & BIT(IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_OR)) {
>> + /*
>> + * The register value resets to zero after reading. We therefore
>> + * need to read once and manually extract the lower and upper
>> + * count register fields.
>> + */
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, IRS_REG_COUNT, &count);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Could not read count (%d)\n", ret);
>> +
>> + upper_count = IRS_UPPER_COUNT(count);
>> + lower_count = IRS_LOWER_COUNT(count);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We only check the OR mode to be able to push events for
>> + * rising and falling thresholds. AND mode is covered when both
>> + * upper and lower count is non-zero, and is signaled with
>> + * IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER.
>
> Whey you say AND, you mean that both thresholds have been crossed but also that
> in that configuration either being crossed would also have gotten us to here?
> (as opposed to the interrupt only occurring if value is greater than rising threshold
> and less than falling threshold?)
>
> If it's the first then just report two events. Either means we don't know, rather
> than we know both occurred. We don't document that well though - so something
> we should improved there. whilst a bit confusing:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc6/source/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio#L792
> talks about this.
>
> The bracketed case is more annoying to deal with so I hope you don't mean that.
> Whilst we've had sensors that support it in hardware for years, I don't think we
> ever came up with a usecase that really justified describing it.
According to the data sheet (which will hopefully be soon publicly
available):
OR-interrupt: (UPPER_COUNT + LOWER_COUNT >= NR_COUNT)
AND-interrupt: (UPPER_COUNT + LOWER_COUNT >= NR_COUNT) &&
(UPPER_COUNT != 0) && (LOWER_COUNT != 0)
For example, consider the following situation:
___
/ \
-----------------------------3------------------- Upper threshold
___ / \
______ / \ / \___________ Data signal
\ / \ /
-------1------------2---------------------------- Lower threshold
\__/ \__/
When `NR_COUNT` is set to 3, we will get an OR-interrupt on point "3" in
the graph above. In this case `UPPER_COUNT = 1` and `LOWER_COUNT = 2`.
When `NR_COUNT` is set to 2, we will get an OR-interrupt on point "2"
instead. Here `UPPER_COUNT = 0` and `LOWER_COUNT = 2`.
>
>> + */
>> + if (upper_count && !lower_count)
>> + dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING;
>> + else if (!upper_count && lower_count)
>> + dir = IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING;
>> + else
>> + dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER;
>> +
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_UNMOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_PROXIMITY, 0,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH, dir),
>> + iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The OR mode will always trigger when the AND mode does, but
>> + * not vice versa. However, it seems like the AND bit needs to
>> + * be cleared if data capture _and_ threshold count interrupts
>> + * are desirable, even though it hasn't explicitly been selected
>> + * (with IRS_REG_INTR). Either way, it doesn't hurt...
>> + */
>> + clear |= BIT(IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_OR) |
>> + BIT(IRS_INTR_COUNT_THR_AND);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (clear) {
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, IRS_REG_STATUS, clear);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(data->dev,
>> + "Could not clear interrupt status (%d)\n", ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t irsd200_trigger_handler(int irq, void *pollf)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = ((struct iio_poll_func *)pollf)->indio_dev;
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + s16 buf = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = irsd200_read_data(data, &buf);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto end;
>> +
>> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &buf,
>> + iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
>> +
>> +end:
>> + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>> +
>> + return ret ? IRQ_NONE : IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_buf_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(data->regfields[IRS_REGF_INTR_DATA], 1);
>
> This looks to be turning on the interrupt.
> Whilst the abstract trigger driving capture into a buffer model doesn't always
> cleanly fit a driver architecture, in this case this seems like it should be
> in the set_trigger_state() callback not here.
Alright, I'll move them to `set_trigger_state()`.
>
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev,
>> + "Could not enable data interrupt source (%d)\n", ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_buf_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct irsd200_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_field_write(data->regfields[IRS_REGF_INTR_DATA], 0);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev,
>> + "Could not disable data interrupt source (%d)\n", ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
[...]
>> +static const struct iio_event_spec irsd200_event_spec[] = {
>> + /* Upper threshold value. */
> As below, the code is pretty much self documenting, so I'd drop
> comments that can just become out of date. Comments are good when they
> add information but here I don't think they do.
Will remove!
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING,
>> + .mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE) | BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_ENABLE),
>> + },
>> + /* Lower threshold value. */
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING,
>> + .mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE) | BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_ENABLE),
>> + },
>> + /* Window time. */
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_CHANGE,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_NONE,
>> + .mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_TIMEOUT) | BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_ENABLE),
>
> This is unusual use of ABI. Please given some more detail on what it is.
Explained above.
>
>> + },
>> + /* Number of counts (exceeding thresholds) before interrupt. */
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER,
>> + .mask_separate = BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD),
>> + },
>> + /* Low-pass filter frequency. */
>
> Documentation doesn't add anything over code, so drop it.
> Also combined all these cases where type and dir match into one entry
> with multiple bits set in mask_separate etc.
Will do!
>
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER,
>> + .mask_separate = BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB),
>> + },
>> + /* High-pass filter frequency. */
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + .dir = IIO_EV_DIR_EITHER,
>> + .mask_separate = BIT(IIO_EV_INFO_HIGH_PASS_FILTER_3DB),
>> + },
>> +};
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int irsd200_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_trigger *trigger;
>> + struct irsd200_data *data;
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> + size_t i;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &irsd200_regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not initialize regmap\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
>> + }
>> +
>> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
>> + if (!indio_dev) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not allocate iio device\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> + data->regmap = regmap;
>> + data->dev = &client->dev;
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
>
> I'm not seeing any where this is ready back... Don't set it unless you need
> it.
You are right.
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < IRS_REGF_MAX; ++i) {
>> + data->regfields[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
>> + data->dev, data->regmap, irsd200_regfields[i]);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->regfields[i])) {
>> + dev_err(data->dev,
>> + "Could not allocate register field %zu\n", i);
>> + return PTR_ERR(data->regfields[i]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = irsd200_setup(data);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + indio_dev->info = &irsd200_info;
>> + indio_dev->name = IRS_DRV_NAME;
>> + indio_dev->channels = irsd200_channels;
>> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(irsd200_channels);
>> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>> +
>> + if (!client->irq) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "No irq available\n");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&client->dev, indio_dev, NULL,
>> + irsd200_trigger_handler,
>> + &irsd200_buf_ops);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>> + "Could not setup iio triggered buffer (%d)\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq, NULL,
>> + irsd200_irq_thread,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + NULL, indio_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
>> + "Could not request irq (%d)\n", ret);
>> + }
> Brackets not needed. Doesn't matter as a one off, but if you take
> a lot more of these to dev_err_probe() like here then it will shorten
> your code a fair bit and make it slightly easier to review (more on the
> screen at a time etc).
Interesting that `checkpatch.pl` missed this one. Yes, I'll change to
`dev_err_probe()`.
> As noted in DT binding review, it's definitely a good thing to support
> basic operation in the absence of the interrupt line being wired up.
> Normally that involves not registering all the stuff that needs the interrupt
> and providing alternative iio_info, channels and some polling code to
> us for data ready detection. On majority of hardware you can make triggered
> buffers work without interrupts (driven by an hrtimer trigger or similar)
> so you keep that available for both interrupt and non interrupt cases.
Answered there.
>> +
>> + trigger = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&client->dev, "%s-dev%d",
>> + indio_dev->name,
>> + iio_device_id(indio_dev));
>> + if (!trigger) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not allocate iio trigger\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + trigger->ops = &irsd200_trigger_ops;
>> + iio_trigger_set_drvdata(trigger, indio_dev);
>> +
>> + ret = devm_iio_trigger_register(&client->dev, trigger);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not register iio trigger (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not register iio device (%d)\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>
> Lars pointed this out already. It is fine (and generally a good idea) to
> use dev_err_probe() for paths like this in probe. Some of it's functionality
> is irrelevant (the deferred handling) but it does no harm in other paths and
> makes the code more compact and easier to review.
Yeah, I'll change to `dev_err_probe()`.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists