Message-ID: <CAJD7tkakB5nr+AZWJAJLzz8BcvYOa9tSvDWFmKN20cfv+kFPVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2023 21:34:10 -0700
From:   Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)" <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
        Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
        Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
        "T.J. Alumbaugh" <talumbau@...gle.com>,
        Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] Revert "mm/migrate: __unmap_and_move() push good
 newpage to LRU"

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 9:29 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:00 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Yosry,
> >>
> >> Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > This reverts commit c3096e6782b733158bf34f6bbb4567808d4e0740.
> >> >
> >> > That commit made sure we immediately add the new page to the LRU before
> >> > remove_migration_ptes() is called in migrate_move_folio() (used to be
> >> > __unmap_and_move() back then), such that the rmap walk will rebuild the
> >> > correct mlock_count for the page again. This was needed because the
> >> > mlock_count was lost when the page is isolated. This is no longer the
> >> > case since mlock_count no longer overlays page->lru.
> >> >
> >> > Revert the commit (the code was foliated afterward the commit, so the
> >> > revert is updated as such).
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  mm/migrate.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> >> > index 01cac26a3127..68f693731865 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> >> > @@ -1279,19 +1279,6 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
> >> >       if (unlikely(!is_lru))
> >> >               goto out_unlock_both;
> >>
> >> The patch itself looks good to me!  Thanks!
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look!
> >
> >>
> >> And, it seems that we can remove the above 2 lines and "out_unlock_both"
> >> label now.  That can make the code simpler a little.  Right?
> >
> > I am not familiar with this code. If we remove the above condition
> > then pages that have is_lru == 0 (i.e __PageMovable(src) is true) and
> > page_was_mapped == 1 will call remove_migration_ptes(). This wouldn't
> > happen without removing the above 2 lines. If this combination is
> > impossible (is_lru == 0 && page_was_mapped == 1), then yeah we can
> > remove the above condition.
> >
> > It looks like __SetPageMovable() is only called by zsmalloc, z3fold,
> > and balloon_page_insert(). The former 2 will never have those pages
> > mapped into userspace. I am not familiar with balloon_page_insert(),
> > but my gut feeling is that those are pages used by the driver and are
> > also not mapped into userspace.
>
> You can take a look at migrate_folio_unmap(), where "page_was_mapped"
> will not be set to 1 if !is_lru.

Oh I was looking in the wrong place huh, thanks. Will remove it when I respin!

>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> > So I guess we can just remove the condition, but a confirmation for
> > the above would be reassuring :)
> >
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Huang, Ying
> >>
> >> > -     /*
> >> > -      * When successful, push dst to LRU immediately: so that if it
> >> > -      * turns out to be an mlocked page, remove_migration_ptes() will
> >> > -      * automatically build up the correct dst->mlock_count for it.
> >> > -      *
> >> > -      * We would like to do something similar for the old page, when
> >> > -      * unsuccessful, and other cases when a page has been temporarily
> >> > -      * isolated from the unevictable LRU: but this case is the easiest.
> >> > -      */
> >> > -     folio_add_lru(dst);
> >> > -     if (page_was_mapped)
> >> > -             lru_add_drain();
> >> > -
> >> >       if (page_was_mapped)
> >> >               remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, false);
> >> >
> >> > @@ -1301,9 +1288,16 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
> >> >       /*
> >> >        * If migration is successful, decrease refcount of dst,
> >> >        * which will not free the page because new page owner increased
> >> > -      * refcounter.
> >> > +      * refcounter. As well, if it is LRU folio, add the folio to LRU
> >> > +      * list in here. Use the old state of the isolated source folio to
> >> > +      * determine if we migrated a LRU folio. dst was already unlocked
> >> > +      * and possibly modified by its owner - don't rely on the folio
> >> > +      * state.
> >> >        */
> >> > -     folio_put(dst);
> >> > +     if (unlikely(!is_lru))
> >> > +             folio_put(dst);
> >> > +     else
> >> > +             folio_putback_lru(dst);
> >> >
> >> >       /*
> >> >        * A folio that has been migrated has all references removed
> >>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists