linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 8/9] mptcp: consolidate transition to TCP_CLOSE in mptcp_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230620-upstream-net-next-20230620-mptcp-expose-more-info-and-misc-v1-8-62b9444bfd48@tessares.net>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:30:21 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 8/9] mptcp: consolidate transition to TCP_CLOSE in
 mptcp_do_fastclose()

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>

The MPTCP code always set the msk state to TCP_CLOSE before
calling performing the fast-close. Move such state transition in
mptcp_do_fastclose() to avoid some code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 4ebd6e9aa949..f65eec3e0d22 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2655,6 +2655,7 @@ static void mptcp_do_fastclose(struct sock *sk)
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 
+	inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 	mptcp_for_each_subflow_safe(msk, subflow, tmp)
 		__mptcp_close_ssk(sk, mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow),
 				  subflow, MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE);
@@ -2692,10 +2693,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state
 	 */
 	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
-		if (mptcp_should_close(sk)) {
-			inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
+		if (mptcp_should_close(sk))
 			mptcp_do_fastclose(sk);
-		}
+
 		if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
 			__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
 			goto unlock;
@@ -2938,7 +2938,6 @@ static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
 void __mptcp_unaccepted_force_close(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
-	inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 	mptcp_do_fastclose(sk);
 	__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
 }
@@ -2980,7 +2979,6 @@ bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 		/* If the msk has read data, or the caller explicitly ask it,
 		 * do the MPTCP equivalent of TCP reset, aka MPTCP fastclose
 		 */
-		inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 		mptcp_do_fastclose(sk);
 		timeout = 0;
 	} else if (mptcp_close_state(sk)) {

-- 
2.40.1