linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add Synquacer platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 19:54:39 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, masahisa.kojima@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add Synquacer platforms

On 20/06/2023 19:24, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> +  $nodename:
>>> +    const: '/'
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - socionext,developer-box
>>> +              - socionext,synquacer
>>> +          - const: socionext,sc2a11b
>>
>> That's quite different change.
>>
> So it is not carrying your ack.
> 
>> What is synquacer in this case? You claim
>> now it is a board, but based on previous discussions and U-Boot source
>> it does not look like such.
>>
> I never made that claim. I said Kojima-san will confirm. He informed
> Synquacer is a brand name.
> 
> Currently no code internally or externally differentiates between
> SC2A11B and Synquacer and we might as well keep living with Synquacer
> only. This patch is an attempt to be accurate.

Then the patch is not correct, because synquacer is not a board. We
should anyway choose only one for adding to documentation.

Best regards,
Krzysztof