[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230419-dynamic-vmon-v4-7-4d3734e62ada@skidata.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:03:00 +0200
From: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: support.opensource@...semi.com,
DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com,
Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 07/13] regulator: find active protections during
initialization
From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
It can happen that monitors are activated before the kernel is started,
e.g. by bootloader or by OTP. If monitoring workarounds are active on a
regulator, the core shouldn't perform the state changes without applying
the workaround to the regulator. Therefore, warn the user already during
initialization that the device-tree should be adapted.
Warning can be fixed by enabling (or disabling) monitoring in the DT,
e.g.:
regulator-uv-protection-microvolt = <1>;
or
regulator-ov-error-microvolt = <0>;
Constraints regarding the monitoring of a regulator can usually be found
in the docu.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index ca5d6ba889dc..9bddab17450e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1564,6 +1564,47 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
}
}
+ /*
+ * When the core is in charge of handling monitoring workarounds,
+ * it is essential to know if a monitor is already active during
+ * initialization.
+ */
+ if (rdev->desc->mon_disable_reg_disabled ||
+ rdev->desc->mon_disable_reg_set_higher ||
+ rdev->desc->mon_disable_reg_set_lower ||
+ rdev->desc->mon_unsupported_reg_modes) {
+ unsigned int monitor_state = REGULATOR_MONITOR_NONE;
+
+ ret = ops->get_active_protections(rdev, &monitor_state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!rdev->constraints->over_voltage_detection &&
+ (monitor_state & REGULATOR_MONITOR_OVER_VOLTAGE)) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "dt unaware of active %s monitor!\n",
+ "over-voltage");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (!rdev->constraints->under_voltage_detection &&
+ (monitor_state & REGULATOR_MONITOR_UNDER_VOLTAGE)) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "dt unaware of active %s monitor!\n",
+ "under-voltage");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (!rdev->constraints->over_current_detection &&
+ (monitor_state & REGULATOR_MONITOR_OVER_CURRENT)) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "dt unaware of active %s monitor!\n",
+ "over-current");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (!rdev->constraints->over_temp_detection &&
+ (monitor_state & REGULATOR_MONITOR_OVER_TEMPERATURE)) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "dt unaware of active %s monitor!\n",
+ "over-temperature");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
if (rdev->constraints->over_current_detection)
ret = handle_notify_limits(rdev,
ops->set_over_current_protection,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists