[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202306201259.D3E15331@keescook>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:08:15 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: check for missing Fixes tags
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:45:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This check looks for common words that probably indicate a patch
> is a fix. For now the regex is:
>
> (?:BUG: KASAN|Call Trace:|stable\@|syzkaller)
I thought the bare word "syzkaller" was going to match too much, but
looking through commit logs, it seems fine. If it does end up too noisy,
perhaps "@syzkaller"?
For "BUG: KASAN", though, I think we need to make this more general to
catch KCSAN, KMSAN, UBSAN, etc:
(?:(?:BUG: K.|UB)SAN: |Call Trace:|stable\@|syzkaller)
UBSAN does not prefix itself with "BUG: " like the others:
$ git grep 'pr_err(".*SAN:'
kernel/kcsan/report.c: pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: %s in %ps / %ps\n",
kernel/kcsan/report.c: pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: %s in %pS\n", get_bug_type(ai->access_type),
lib/ubsan.c: pr_err("UBSAN: %s in %s:%d:%d\n", reason, loc->file_name,
mm/kasan/report.c: pr_err("BUG: KASAN: %s in %pS\n", info->bug_type, (void *)info->ip);
mm/kasan/report.c: pr_err("BUG: KASAN: invalid-access\n");
mm/kmsan/report.c: pr_err("BUG: KMSAN: %s in %pSb\n", bug_type,
But, yes, please, I love this idea. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists