linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ0PR12MB567659A4B500A2E3FD004452A05CA@SJ0PR12MB5676.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:12:43 +0000
From:   Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
To:     Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC:     "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit
 writes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 3:32 PM
> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>; Mark
> Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; Besar Wicaksono
> <bwicaksono@...dia.com>; Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>;
> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
> by the PMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index a3f1c410b417..f8b4a149eb88 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -702,7 +702,10 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct
> perf_event *event, u64 val)
>         if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
>                 offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
> 
> -               writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> +               if (supports_64bit_atomics(cspmu))

Looks good to me, but this function was recently replaced by
arm_cspmu::has_atomic_dword. Please rebase the patch.

Thanks,
Besar

> +                       writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> +               else
> +                       lo_hi_writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
>         } else {
>                 offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
> 
> --
> 2.40.1