[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <423d2a3c-6b4d-449f-5fa6-5402467e1b6e@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:15:39 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hancock@...systems.ca" <hancock@...systems.ca>,
"woojung.huh@...rochip.com" <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: follow errata
sheet when applying fixups
On 19/06/2023 19.31, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 10:16 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>
>> Fixes: 1fc33199185d ("net: dsa: microchip: Add PHY errata
>> workarounds")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>> ---
>> While I do believe this is a fix, I don't think it's post-rc7
>> material, hence targeting net-next with cc stable.
>
> I don't think this will apply to net-next as the relevant code has been
> moved to the Micrel PHY driver and removed from this one in the
> following commits,
Ah, sorry about that. This code hadn't been touched in a very long time,
so I didn't actually think to check -next.
and effectively the same change to disable autoneg
> before the register writes and re-enable afterwards was incorporated:
Yes, except it seems to always enable autoneg, even if the phy was
strapped otherwise. That's not a problem for our use case.
> However, your patch may be reasonable to apply to -rc7 or stable as a
> more targeted change for those releases.
Well, yes, it could be backported, but then there'd be a (simple)
conflict when net-next is to be merged in the next window. So I don't
think it's worth it.
Unless the net maintainers decide otherwise, please just drop this patch.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists