[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7627f2b9-2287-46d2-b461-d33aa69931a8@moroto.mountain>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:06:34 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>,
Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: Delete debugfs checking
Debugfs functions are not supposed to be checked for errors. This
is sort of unusual but it is described in the comments for the
debugfs_create_dir() function. Also debugfs_create_dir() can never
return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
I spotted this code because I was looking at patches which were sent
to stable but without a Fixes tag. The correct way of checking for
error pointers is not IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), it's IS_ERR(). When a function
returns both error pointers and NULL, the NULL should be treated as a
special kind of success. Please see my blog for more details.
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/08/01/mixing-error-pointers-and-null/
I have not included a Fixes tag here, because it's not really a bug fix,
it's just a clean up.
arch/loongarch/kernel/unaligned.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unaligned.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unaligned.c
index 85fae3d2d71a..3abf163dda05 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unaligned.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unaligned.c
@@ -485,8 +485,6 @@ static int __init debugfs_unaligned(void)
struct dentry *d;
d = debugfs_create_dir("loongarch", NULL);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(d))
- return -ENOMEM;
debugfs_create_u32("unaligned_instructions_user",
S_IRUGO, d, &unaligned_instructions_user);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists