[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJFhX3RYknrkcN0x@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:20:47 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+13a08c0bf4d212766c3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+14234ccf6d0ef629ec1a@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+4e2e47f32607d0f72d43@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+472626bb5e7c59fb768f@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] crypto: af_alg/hash: Fix recvmsg() after
sendmsg(MSG_MORE)
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 08:42:15AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> Not so. hash_recvmsg() will call crypto_ahash_init() first because ctx->more
> is false (hence why we came down this branch in hash_sendmsg()) and the result
> was released on the previous line (which you're objecting to). If it goes to
> the "done" label, it will skip setting ctx->more to true if MSG_MORE is
> passed.
I see, yes it should work.
> However, given you want sendmsg() to do the init->digest cycle on zero length
> data, I think we should revert to the previous version of the patch that makes
> a pass of the loop even with no data.
Let's get this fixed ASAP and we can refine it later.
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists