[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hw7eCAE+5NVyc_D=qriK21kZ8aJFOD0G4MBr0qjMLfUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:23:21 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, Ray.Huang@....com, Deepak.Sharma@....com,
Wyes.Karny@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com, Sunpeng.Li@....com,
Xinmei.Huang@....com, Xiaojian.Du@....com, Li.Meng@....com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use the acpi_pm_profile_server()
symbol
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 4:53 AM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> On 6/15/23 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 8:35 AM Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> >>
> >> Avoid duplication of functionality by using the generic symbol.
> >> This does have a functional change that intel-pstate will now
> >> match "SOHO server" as well.
> >
> > And why do you think that it is a good idea to change this behavior?
>
> The idea was to cover all possible server types. It seemed that it could
> be an oversight that it wasn't included initially.
>
> Is that not the case and it is "intentionally" not including "SOHO server"?
Yes, it is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists