[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230620092906.GXZJFxYpyR2Sf9PM84@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:29:06 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 6/7] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper
function
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:33:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Putting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during kexec() to park CPUs.
>
> Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> ---
> V2: Fix rebase screwup
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -853,47 +853,38 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid,
> return (send_status | accept_status);
> }
>
> -static int
> -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
> +static void send_init_sequence(int phys_apicid)
> {
> - unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
> - int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
> -
> - maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
> + int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
Whoops:
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: In function ‘send_init_sequence’:
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:860:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
860 | int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| ^~~
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists