linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v9 05/51] x86/coco: move CONFIG_HAS_CC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230620120920.GAZJGW8B6XHrsoLGCJ@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:09:20 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
        dgilbert@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
        nikunj.dadhania@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
        zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v9 05/51] x86/coco: move CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM check
 down into coco/Makefile

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Currently CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM is a prereq for building anything in
					^^^^^^

Use proper english words pls.

> arch/x86/coco, but that is generally only applicable for guest support.
> 
> For SEV-SNP, helpers related purely to host support will also live in
> arch/x86/coco. To allow for CoCo-related host support code in
> arch/x86/coco, move that check down into the Makefile and check for it
> specifically when needed.

I have no clue what that means. Example?

The last time we talked about paths, we ended up agreeing on:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yg5nh1RknPRwIrb8@zn.tnic/

So your "helpers related purely to host support" should go to

arch/x86/virt/svm/sev*.c

And just to keep it simple, that should be

arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c

and if there's real need to split that, we can do that later.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette