linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r0q6pbry.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:18:41 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     zhumao001@...suo.com, fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com, ajd@...ux.ibm.com,
        arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word

zhumao001@...suo.com writes:
> Delete repeated word in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <zhumao001@...suo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(struct 
> cxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr)
>        * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to 
> the
>        * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable.
>        * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction 
> hence
> -     * we dont dont need one here.
> +     * we dont need one here.

I know the rule is to only do one change per patch, but if you're fixing
the wording of a comment you can absolutely fix the spelling at the same
time.

So please send a v2 with "dont" spelt correctly.

cheers