[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90bf1d9d-1df3-acd1-5ecb-0c4e343ceffd@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:36:21 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>,
Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>
Subject: Re: Fwd: kernel/cpu.c: linux misses the initialization of one CPU
(off-by-one regression)
[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 29.05.23 03:50, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> [...]
> #regzbot introduced: 18415f33e2ac4a https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217498
> #regzbot title: Off-by-one CPU initalization when CONFIG_NR_CPUS equal to actual system CPU count
Fix in next (just like the culprit):
#regzbot fix: 06c6796e0304234
#regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists