linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:42:09 -0400
From:   Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
        tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com, l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO
 configuration

On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:35:48 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:33 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:18:12 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:08 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:31:04 +0300
> > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > did you have a chance to look at V8 (sent two weks ago) which fixed all
> > > > of what we discussed?
> > >
> > > The patch 6 already has my tag, anything specific you want me to do?
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> > I forgot to remove your "Reviewed-by: Andy..." tag before sending V8
> > since there were some changes involved in patch 6 and I wanted you to
> > review them. Can you confirm if the changes are correct?
> >
> > I also added a new patch "remove obsolete out_thread label". It has no
> > real impact on the code generation itself, but maybe you can review and
> > confirm if tags are ok or not, based on commit message and also
> > additional commit message.
> 
> Both are fine to me.

Hi,
Ok, thank you for reviewing this.

I guess now we are good to go with this series if the stable tags and
patches order are good after Greg's review?

Hugo.