[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5r02p455-26oq-9r61-ss01-679977osr722@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/79] cramfs: switch to new ctime accessors
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the ctime.tv_nsec field is
> utilized. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net
Yet all that's needed here is to simply set time entries to 0 as cramfs
doesn't time stamp its files. It could as well be done with memset().
> ---
> fs/cramfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> index 27c6597aa1be..039ce0f8858b 100644
> --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> }
>
> /* Struct copy intentional */
> - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = zerotime;
> + inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode_ctime_set(inode, zerotime);
> /* inode->i_nlink is left 1 - arguably wrong for directories,
> but it's the best we can do without reading the directory
> contents. 1 yields the right result in GNU find, even
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists