linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cfi: Fix ret_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:16:59 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com,
        jpoimboe@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com,
        tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cfi: Fix ret_from_fork indirect calls

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:08:46AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

> Ah yeah, it should be direct-called only. I keep forgetting about the
> endbr removal pass.
> 
> > I can't seem to manage to have it clobber it's __cfi hash value. Ideally
> > we'd have an attribute to force the thing to 0 or something.
> 
> Doesn't objtool have logic to figure out this is only ever
> direct-called?

It does; let me also use that same thing to clobber the kCFI hashes for
these functions.