[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d800e80-3860-d58c-3a96-0f5e73cb9309@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:17:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomba@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] dma-buf: Change locking policy for mmap()
On 6/21/23 08:42, Christian König wrote:
> Am 20.06.23 um 17:58 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> On 5/31/23 22:58, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> On 5/30/23 01:39, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Change locking policy of mmap() callback, making exporters responsible
>>>> for handling dma-buf reservation locking. Previous locking policy
>>>> stated
>>>> that dma-buf is locked for both importers and exporters by the dma-buf
>>>> core, which caused a deadlock problem for DRM drivers in a case of
>>>> self-imported dma-bufs which required to take the lock from the DRM
>>>> exporter side.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 17 +++--------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>> Christian, you acked the drm patch of this series sometime ago, perhaps
>>> it also implies implicit ack to this patch, but I'd prefer to have the
>>> explicit ack. I'll apply this series to drm-misc later this week if
>>> you'll approve this dma-buf change. Thanks in advance!
>> I'll merge the patches tomorrow. If there are any additional comments,
>> then please don't hesitate to post them.
>
> Sorry for not responding earlier, I have been moving both my office as
> well as my household and still catching up.
>
> I don't have time for an in-deep review, but my ack stands for the whole
> series.
Thanks! I'll add yours ack and merge patches soon
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists