linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] mfd: atmel-hlcdc: Add compatible for SAM9X7 HLCD controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230621195929.GV10378@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:59:29 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
        sam@...nborg.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org, airlied@...il.com,
        daniel@...ll.ch, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com,
        Balamanikandan.Gunasundar@...rochip.com,
        Durai.ManickamKR@...rochip.com, Nayabbasha.Sayed@...rochip.com,
        Dharma.B@...rochip.com, Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com,
        Balakrishnan.S@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] mfd: atmel-hlcdc: Add compatible for SAM9X7 HLCD
 controller

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023, Conor Dooley wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:56:45PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
> > 
> > > Add compatible for SAM9X7 HLCD controller.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/atmel-hlcdc.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > Applied, thanks
> 
> Hmm, Nicolas pointed out that this compatible is likely insufficient,
> and it'll likely need to be sam9x70 & sam9x75 as there are differences
> between what each of these SoCs support.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ef09246c-9220-4c71-4ac2-2792d9ca519d@microchip.com/
> I guess it doesn't really matter, since the binding didn't get applied
> and what's in the driver can be arbitrarily changed?

Unapplied, thanks. :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]